Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.1. - API updates following infra changes

Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.1. - API updates following infra changes

From: "Michael Spector" <spektom@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:21:22 +0300
Delivered-to: pdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=aj9qK9XSX2xdjqRxnCdIdPlDt2++l1//hsWRQgUyn617k5HmkVld65Wyz27gSAUmWw kbA7Iu3szQbTp3b3Uo1VIYopWEeNo0aaXdCerMH6ZOuIqrBZTP0dRP7jLZ0j6seBHybP GvAreEfIt52oCSOiWl6mEQYM5tggEjRQP9f0o=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/pdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev>, <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev>, <mailto:pdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

IMHO, code should never just be deleted, even if it's "internal." But
then, IANAL, just paranoid of the Wrath of the IP Team. :)

I agree that this is paranoid - we have version control system that saves all the history.

Michael

References:
- [pdt-dev] PDT 1.1. - API updates following infra changes
  - From: Roy Ganor
- RE: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.1. - API updates following infra changes
  - From: Roy Ganor
- Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.1. - API updates following infra changes
  - From: Seva Lapsha
- Re: [pdt-dev] PDT 1.1. - API updates following infra changes
  - From: Nick Boldt