Hi
I see there are 24 bugs with attachments which are not flagged.
Most are contribution from Dirk Fauth which got commited by him
afterward, should we go ahead and flag them ?
This one :
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=419447
has been contributed through gerrit which means we can just flag
the patch as outdated, right ?
Cheers,
Cédric
Le 16/10/2013 15:44, Wayne Beaton a écrit :
The "Contribution Review" tool can help
http://eclipse.org/projects/tools/ip_contribution_review.php?id=technology.nebula
Note that any contribution that has a Git record with the author
field is set correctly will automatically appear in the IP Log.
The only reason that you might need to tag a contribution iplog+
in Bugzilla is if it came before the switch to Git, or if the
author field has not been set correctly.
The suggestions made Contribution Review tool (which should
probably be renamed the "Bugzilla Contribution Review" tool) are
pretty coarse. It doesn't really attempt to understand the nature
of attachments, only that they exist.
Keep in mind that timing is important. Bug 411669 is an
interesting one because it contains a patch contributed and then
committed by Dirk Fauth. The attachment is flagged because it was
added before Dirk became a committer. According to the rules, this
needs to appear in the IP Log.
HTH,
Wayne
On 10/16/2013 07:05 AM, Wim Jongman
wrote:
Hi Cedric,
Thanks for chasing this.
In the past months Wayne and I have gone through a lot
bugs to provide the iplog flags. I see already flagged bugs
in this list so this makes it unclear what already has been
processed.
Adding Wayne for comments.
Best regards,
Wim
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev