Hi Chris,
the Helios flag is set to „1“ in the portal (your change has
been successfull), so we should be part of the project list in the future.
Best regards,
Florian
Von:
jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag
von Christian Saad
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Dezember 2009 11:08
An: 'Java Workflow Toolbox'
Betreff: [jwt-dev] AW: [cross-project-issues-dev] Some reminders about
Helios M4
Hi all,
I guess we do have to join in here, don’t we?
Regards,
Chris
Von:
cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von David
M Williams
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 18:45
An: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [cross-project-issues-dev] Some reminders about Helios M4
1. its next
Friday, 12/18!
2. That's the
deadline for expressing intent to participate in Helios, which is formally done
by marking the simultaneousrelease flag in Eclipse Portal (there's a Helios
field to edit to "1"). The list is currently (understandably)
short, so I'll keep my eye on it, and send more nag notes if expected teams
don't mark soon.
modeling.amalgam
modeling.emf.compare
modeling.emf.eef
modeling.m2t.acceleo
rt.jetty
rt.swordfish
stp.sca
technology.egit
technology.subversive
tools.ptp
webtools
3. I suggest we
not "announce" our individual Project milestones until the
Helios M4 date, 12/18. Of course, we need to announce on mailing lists, etc., for
our committers and adopters ... I just mean the general news items, forums, and
similar, targeted to general end-users asking for early testing. That is
what we have to do for the final release, and I suggest we get in the habit of
working "simultaneously" now, even during milestones. Not a huge
problem, but I do recall some issue in the past where there were complaints or
questions, because someone tried to update part of their environment, but
couldn't, since some other part had not release an M4 version yet. Ends up
being frustrating and making us appear unorganized. (And we all know that's not
true :)
Thanks,
|