| AW: [jwt-dev] AgilPro metamodel vs XPDL schema comparison |
Hi Steve, thanks for your detailed comparison of AgilPro and XPDL. Please find my comments to your document inline. What is your impression of AgilPro? Surely there are many properties that we need to include - but this can be done easily. In my opinion the most important aspects of XPDL 1 are already available. Would you agree? Perhaps somebody else can say some words about XPDL 2.0 and how much changes to the meta-model would be necessary to support XPDL 2, too? Best regards, Florian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jwt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Steve.Egbert@xxxxxxxx Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 03:37 An: jwt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [jwt-dev] AgilPro metamodel vs XPDL schema comparison My name is Steve Egbert and I am working in the XPDL subgroup. I have undertaken to address the AgilPro metamodel - XPDL issue. I am working on a document assessing the compatability between the AgilPro metamodel and the XPDL schema. In order to avoid driving off into the weeds for an extended journey, I wanted to expose my work in progress to the community and get any constructive feedback that the assembled multitude would want to provide. Therefore, attached is the begining of my document. This is only the start and it is nowhere near complete Thank you all Steve Egbert (See attached file: AgilPro Metamodel.doc) (it is in MSWord97 format)
Attachment:
AgilPro_Metamodel_FL.doc
Description: MS-Word document