[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [iot-wg] IoT Developer Survey results
|
James,
We will be published the absolute numbers tomorrow. However we don't
have the numbers broken out across CPU vs MCUs. It was something we
discussed during that call and something I'd like to add next year.
On 4/13/2016 12:38 PM, James Pace wrote:
Ian, everyone, apologies for being unable to make the call today, but I just wanted to commend everyone for the quality of the survey.
One question regarding slide 20: would it be possible to provide absolute numbers for the breakout across operating systems? I ask because I (and probably others) would like to better understand the numbers across CPUs (e.g., often mains-powered gateways; CPUs have MMUs) versus MCUs (e.g., no MMU; very often constrained, battery-powered).
appreciatively,
James Pace
http://runtime.io/
On Apr 13, 2016, at 8:37, Ian Skerrett <ian.skerrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,
Here is a copy of the IoT Developer Survey. I will be going through the results during our call later today.
We are planning to publish the results tomorrow, so I would appreciate if you please not distribute them until we make them public.
Talk to you soon,
Ian
--
Ian Skerrett
VP of Marketing
Eclipse Foundation
(m) 613-240-7210
(o) 613-224-9461 ext 227
(t) @ianskerrett
<IoT Developer Survey 2016 Report v2.pdf>_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
_______________________________________________
iot-wg mailing list
iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
--
Ian Skerrett
VP of Marketing
Eclipse Foundation
(m) 613-240-7210
(o) 613-224-9461 ext 227
(t) @ianskerrett
