Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 06:16:22 -0400
Delivered-to: iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/iot-wg>
List-help: <mailto:iot-wg-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg>, <mailto:iot-wg-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/iot-wg>, <mailto:iot-wg-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

On 12/05/2014 8:55 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:

Should there be an iot-cross-project-ml where cross project issues / directions / technical discussions / synergies could happen? Wdyt?

Hopefully we will soon have an IoT PMC. Would it perhaps make sense to use that list to have such discussions?

--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Kai Kreuzer

References:
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Ian Skerrett
- Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
  - From: Pascal Rapicault

Prev by Date: Re: [iot-wg] Eclipse SCADA: Enhanced Test System with Modbus Export
Next by Date: Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
Previous by thread: Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
Next by thread: Re: [iot-wg] Why use concierge?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top