[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [iot-pmc] Vote for Paho CQ - go.net
|
+1 as pre-req exempt, since only source is distributed and thus no static linking takes place.
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 16:09, Ian Craggs <icraggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Jens,
>
> the advice I received from Al is that we only distribute source for the Go client library. A quick search seems to indicate that this is a common approach, similar to C on Linux, as distributing binaries would involve a proliferation of builds.
>
> Ian
>
> On 04/19/2016 08:11 AM, Jens Reimann wrote:
>> Paho would like to use the "go.net" library. A library with networking
>> stuff, written in "go". [1]
>>
>> Paho would like to go with an pre-req exempt.
>>
>> However I am not this is really the case. First of all "go" executables
>> are, to my knowledge, statically linked. Meaning that Paho could not
>> distribute any form of binary. Which would be fine if they really only
>> distribute source code of their solution.
>>
>> Second, the source code is there and it seems not too big. So it could
>> be checked.
>>
>> I don't see a big difference here between Java libraries and a go library.
>>
>> So let me know what you think!
>>
>> Jens
>>
>> [1] https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10819
>>
>
> --
> Ian Craggs
> icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx IBM United Kingdom
> Paho Project Lead; Committer on Mosquitto
>
> _______________________________________________
> iot-pmc mailing list
> iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
