Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs

I’ve reviewed the Saved Searches that we have made available to the Community.  When we originally created these searches, they were automatically displayed in the footer for Committers. 

 

It appears that a change has occurred so that these searches are now only displayed when the Committer selects “Actions:  Preferences”, followed by “Saved Searches”.   Saved searches that have been saved and shared by others appears in a separate section at the bottom of the page. 

 

In order to display the desired search in your footer, select “Show in Footer”.  This should resolve the problem.

 

Best regards,

Janet

 

From: incubation-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:incubation-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
Sent: March-22-16 3:16 PM
To: incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs

 

That's interesting. I'm not sure why that is. I thought that it was accessible to everybody. Can somebody from the IP Team comment?

Wayne

On 22/03/16 02:48 PM, Werner Keil wrote:

Thanks, but somehow this does not seem visible for every committer/project lead.

 

This is the bottom of IPZilla after i logged in:

  • Actions:

o   Home 

o   | New 

o   | Search 

o   | Jump to CQ #: 

[          ] [Go]

 

o   | Reports 

o   | My Requests 

o   | Preferences 

o   | Log out werner.keil@xxxxxxx 

o   | Terms of Use

  • Saved Searches:

o   My CQs 

o   Approved Orbit Bundles 

o   | Indigo 

o   | Needed for Juno

 

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:35 PM

Subject: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs

 

The IP Team's work queue is accessible by clicking "IP Team Work Queue" at the bottom of any IPZilla page. https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/ Note to lurkers: IPZilla is only accessible by committers.

On 22/03/16 09:34 AM, Werner Keil wrote:

Hi Ben,

 

Thanks for the input. Any idea, when the IP team might get to those CQs. We were at the forefront of JSRs (see https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/issues/333 where JSR 107 discusses a possible change of the same Spec License in its public API already being Final there;-) but addressed all concerns by Eclipse, Apache or similar Open Source ecosystems where either JSR 363 or implementations (GeoAPI) are used or will be in the near future.

 

Although a Java SE implementation of JSR 363 exists https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/uom-se Eclipse not only the Science projects would benefit from using it, too, either directly or via implementations by UOMo.

 

Thanks,

Werner

 

Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. März 2016 um 14:09 Uhr Von: "Benjamin Cabé" mailto:benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxx An: "Discussions for new Eclipse projects" mailto:incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs

Hi Werner,

 

Like Wayne said, before producing a milestone release, or even checking in the code, the IP team need to grant checkin approval. It does not seem to be the case yet for the CQs you are referring to.

 

Benjamin –

 

 

De : <incubation-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxx> Répondre à : Discussions for new Eclipse projects <incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date : mardi 22 mars 2016 12:28 À : <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc : <wlmailhtml:incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx> Objet : Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs

 

Hi Wayne,

 

Thanks for sharing. Guess it also means, incubating UoMo can do a branch or even Milestone release using JSR 363 till the 2 new CQs by SmartHome

 

Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. März 2016 um 04:05 Uhr Von: "Wayne Beaton" <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> An: wlmailhtml:incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: [incubation] Interim Release with Open CQs

Hi Christopher. Projects can do releases while in incubation. All CQs for code/libraries that are included in the release bits must be closed/approved by the IP Team prior to the release. In the time leading up to the release, you can and should distribute milestone builds that includes code/libraries that the IP team has granted checkin approval for. These are not official releases, and should be annotated as such (e.g. 0.7M2). I recommend that the Science Working Group make a master list of all the open CQs that are required for the coordinated autumn release that we can present to the IP Team along with your last question. This should be a relatively easy query if we have a list of participating projects. Giving the IP Team a clear picture of what needs to be accomplished is the best way of getting that question answered. By way of background for those readers who are not involved in the Science Working Group's communications: several of the Science projects have decided to do a coordinated release in the fall (along the lines of what the Planning Council does with the Simultaneous Release) HTH, Wayne  

On 21/03/16 07:04 PM, Christopher Brooks wrote:

Triquetrum is using the Parallel IP Process. We have open CQs for third party material:  

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10439 - diva https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10440 - ptolemy.actor.gui https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10441 - ptolemy.actor.lib https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10442 - ptolemy.core https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10443 - ptolemy.sdf https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10444 - ptolemy.gui https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10445 - ptolemy.moml https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10446 - org.ptolemy.commons https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10856 - ptolemy.domains.process

We would like to participate in the Science/Industry Working Group Autumn 2016 release, which is scheduled for October 21, 2016. Can do an interim release with open CQs while remaining in incubation? https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase says:  

  • Interim Releases. Incubation Phase projects may make releases. All major and minor releases must go through a Release Review.

https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews says:  

Intellectual Property

Before you can consider a Release Review, all of the relevant CQs must be approved by the Eclipse Legal team. We cannot schedule a Review before the Legal team has completed their work. If you are waiting for CQs, please review where your CQs are, and when they are scheduled to be reviewed, in the IP team work queue.

The above indicates to me that we need to have the CQs approved before release review.  Does approved mean closed? If we need to have these CQs closed, is it feasible to have them closed by the end of September so that we can schedule a release review? Thanks, _Christopher  

--
Christopher Brooks, PMP                       University of California
Academic Program Manager & Software Engineer  US Mail: 337 Cory Hall
CHESS/iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm               Berkeley, CA 94720-1774
cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 707.332.0670           (Office: 545Q Cory)

   

_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

 

-- Wayne Beaton @waynebeaton The Eclipse Foundation EclipseCon France 2016

_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list wlmailhtml:incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

-- Wayne Beaton @waynebeaton The Eclipse Foundation EclipseCon
          France 2016


_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

-- Wayne Beaton @waynebeaton The Eclipse Foundation EclipseCon France 2016


Back to the top