| Re: [ide-dev] Java IDEs comparison |
Mickael, thanks for this...I was suspicious myself but never even considered how bad it was (my thought was that the may be using a somewhat representative data set but from North America only or something). I strongly suspect that we still have quite a lead worldwide since Asia is *really* into OSS... On 09/14/2016 12:31 AM, Patrik Suzzi wrote:
I just read a post entitled "The fall of Eclipse" - http://movingfulcrum.com/the-fall-of-eclipse/. https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/52mcf3/the_fall_of_eclipse/d7m4ql6 https://www.reddit.com/r/java/comments/53gmzq/the_fall_of_eclipse/ with a nice bashing of the stats and conclusion of the blog post, and an interesting link to another survery: http://www.baeldung.com/java-ides-2016 Reading the comments, many mention the workspace as an issue. They don't complain with the concept of IntelliJ "projects" which is equivalent. What's usually blamed is that preferences are not stored globally. Oomph preference recorder already has it fixed, right? I also believe that the old habit of using multiple workspaces is something that confuses users and hide the power of Eclipse. Keeping a single workspace is often simpler, and you really can have hundreds of projects open simultaneously for different languages. What could we do to "educate" existing users to not care about workspaces and always work in the same one? -- Mickael Istria Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers My blog - My Tweets_______________________________________________ ide-dev mailing list ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev |
Mickael Istria ---09/22/2016 01:31:01 PM---On 09/14/2016 12:31 AM, Patrik Suzzi wrote: > Hi All,