Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:17:11 +0200
Delivered-to: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ide-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0

On 09/22/2013 04:36 PM, Robin Stocker wrote:

Can we really not do any better?

It's worth opening a bug to in JDT to filter/sort the completion result by compatibility with the type of the assignement, and automatically use the type that right compatible type if only one is available.

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Robin Stocker

References:
- [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Wayne Beaton
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Robin Stocker

Prev by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Next by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Previous by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Next by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs