Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code G

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks

From: Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:15:18 +0200
Delivered-to: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ide-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0

On 09/19/2013 08:58 PM, Mickael Istria wrote:

The "Several minor things" are actually pragmatic feature requests that should be entered in the tracker. I let other people do it ;)

* https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417665
* https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417666
* https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=417670

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets

References:
- [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Wayne Beaton
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Mickael Istria

Prev by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Next by Date: [ide-dev] An "IDE Working Group"
Previous by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Next by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top