[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [epl-discuss] EPLv2 Current Draft
|
All,
We made some minor revisions to the draft today, so please find
attached the following files in .odt, .pdf, and .docx formats:
- EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 - clean: The current draft in a clean state.
- EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs v1.0 - redline: changes since Monday's
draft.
- EPLv2 rev3 vs rev2 - redline: A redline showing the changes
from the last public draft distributed in March.
- EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs rev2 - redline: A redline showing all
changes since EPLv1.
I'm looking forward to our calls next week. As a reminder, they
are:
- Monday, June 5 @ noon Eastern
- Wednesday, June 7 @ 11:00am Eastern
Participant conference extension: 428, then enter pin 5422
North America 1-866-569-4992
Germany 49-692-2224-6059
France 33-17-070-8535
UK 0800-033-7806
Switzerland 41-44-580-2115
Sweden 46-85-063-8386
Italy 003-902-3604-8268
On 2017-05-29 2:30 PM, Mike Milinkovich wrote:
All,
Please find attached the current state of the EPLv2 draft. As
a reminder, please indicate your availability for a conference
call via the Doodle poll at https://doodle.com/poll/i5ufatqnsxhudkd4.
I will select the date and time late tomorrow.
There are three documents, each in .odt, .pdf, and .docx
formats.
- EPLv2 rev3 v1.0 - clean: The current draft in a clean
state.
- EPLv2 rev3 vs rev2 - redline: A redline showing the
changes from the last public draft distributed in March.
- EPLv2 rev3 vs EPLv1 - redline: A redline showing all
changes since EPLv1.
Here is a brief summary of the changes since our last set of
conference calls:
- After much discussion, we removed the definition of
executable code completely, and made the copyleft provision
basically a simple statement that the source code must
always be available. This helped significantly with
addressing the topic of scripting languages and other cases
where the source and executable forms of the code are
identical, or at least similar.
- We added a definition for Distirbution which hopefully
works in the European context.
- We cleaned up the Exhibit A to hopefully make it clearer
that this is a notice that can be optionally added to a code
base.
We considered the topics discussed on the list around
templates and the definition of derivative works, but in the
end decided to leave things pretty much the way they were.
With respect to templates, I have spoken with copyright
holders that prefer the status quo, and we want to make it
easy for projects to adopt the EPLv2, so it makes sense to
leave it as is.
As always, I look forward to your comments and feedback.
|
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs rev2 - redline.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs EPLv1 - redline.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 - clean.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs v1.0 - redline.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs v1.0 - redline.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs rev2 - redline.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs EPLv1 - redline.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 - clean.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs rev2 - redline.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs EPLv1 - redline.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 - clean.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
Attachment:
EPLv2 rev3 v1.1 vs v1.0 - redline.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
