[ee4j-pmc] Request assistance for Jakarta Contexts and Dependency Inject

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[ee4j-pmc] Request assistance for Jakarta Contexts and Dependency Injection

From: Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:37:19 -0600
Delivered-to: ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-pmc/>
List-help: <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc>, <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-pmc>, <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

It was suggested that the current split of the CDI specification into a core part and an integration part should entail a restructuring review like was done for security:

https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.es/reviews/restructuring-review

What is happening in CDI does not really meet the definition of a restructuring review in the EFSP:
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/efsp/?version=1.3#efsp-restructuring-review

and I don't see a restructuring review as one of the types under the create new release option. Are we fine to just create a CDI EE 4.1 release and update the CDI 4.1 release to reference that the integration chapters are being moved into the CDI EE 4.1 release?

Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ee4j-pmc] Request assistance for Jakarta Contexts and Dependency Injection
  - From: Ivar Grimstad

Prev by Date: [ee4j-pmc] PMC Approval required for Project Lead election for Edward Burns on Jakarta EE Platform
Next by Date: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Request assistance for Jakarta Contexts and Dependency Injection
Previous by thread: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Request assistance for Jakarta Contexts and Dependency Injection
Next by thread: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Request assistance for Jakarta Contexts and Dependency Injection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs