[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [ee4j-pmc] Action item: use of the jakarta groupId
|
I want to learn, so please tell me: Why must the *Maven groupId javax* be abandoned by JAX-RS, while we MAY keep the *package name javax*?
-Markus
-----Original Message-----
From: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Milinkovich
Sent: Donnerstag, 13. September 2018 15:56
To: ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Action item: use of the jakarta groupId
On 2018-09-12 5:28 PM, Guillermo González de Agüero wrote:
> My arguments assumed that it has to be done and that we just have to
> decide whether to do it now or later.
That is correct. The technology formerly known as Java EE is being migrated from Oracle to the control of the Eclipse Foundation and the Jakarta EE Working Group.
This *must* be done. The only topic for debate is timing.
--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(m) +1.613.220.3223
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
