Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-community] Some further feedback on the Working Group Charter

+1

We should be at least as inclusive as the JCP (and the JCP EC) has become over the past few years.

Mark.


On 1 Mar 2018, at 17:47, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Membership

The existing version states:

An entity must be at least a Solutions Member​ of the Eclipse Foundation, have executed the EE.next Participation Agreement once defined, and adhere to the requirements set forth in this Charter to participate.

....

I know there's another thread debating membership, but I'd personally raise a red flag to needing to be at least a Solutions Member in order to participate.  My understanding is that Solutions Members are pretty much vendors or orgs planning on releasing some commercial software based on an eclipse project.  This wouldn't be strictly true for say a Java User Group or Open Source project team looking to contribute to EE.next (Jakarta EE).   Perhaps that clause needs to be removed?

Pretty sure this has been raised and I just missed it, if so my apologies again.


---
Mark Little

JBoss, by Red Hat
Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, 6700 Cork Airport Business Park, Kinsale Road, Co. Cork.
Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14 Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, No.304873
Directors:Michael Cunningham (USA), Vicky Wiseman (USA), Michael O'Neill, Keith Phelan, Matt Parson (USA)


Back to the top