Re: [ee4j-community] [eclipse.org-membership-at-large] Proposed EE.next

["John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:32 AM Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Feb 6, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Heiko Rupp <hrupp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 5 Feb 2018, at 20:51, Mike Milinkovich wrote:
>>
>> A proposal has been made to establish the EE.next Working Group
>
> The FAQ says "Strategic members are the vendors that deliver Java EE implementations".
>
> Can you please clarify the role of *projects* like TomEE or Hammock
> that may also deliver an ee4j implementation. Are they included in the term "vendor" above?

No, projects are not members. However, the legal entities that support those projects could join as Strategic Members.

Does individual constitute a legal entity in the eyes of the Eclipse Foundation (with respect to working groups) or only corporate entities?

 

_______________________________________________
ee4j-community mailing list
ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community