Re: [ee4j-community] On Naming

[Michael Nascimento <misterm@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

1. There is a strong desire for a lighter-weight, more nimble process.
   

Given Bean Validation and CDI seem to work just fine through the JCP, could someone from Red Hat comment on their perception about this point?

 

1. The IP and process rules around the JCP are complex, and almost impossible to change. The intent will be to create a new process which provides a level playing field for all of the participants and stakeholders. A more open and egalitarian process will hopefully result in more participants and investment in the platform.
   

If the Eclipse Foundation is the one submitting the JSRs, wouldn't all IP from the specs belong to the Foundation? Wouldn't it be open and egalitarian?

Regards,

Michael

Virus-free. www.avg.com