Re: [ee4j-community] Licensing Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ee4j-community] Licensing Question

From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:55:56 -0400
Delivered-to: ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-community>
List-help: <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-community>, <mailto:ee4j-community-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 2017-10-01 9:00 PM, John D. Ament wrote:

I noticed in the proposal for the new TLP that the license to be usedis dual license of EPL 2.0 and GPL 2.0 w/ CPE. Putting aside that GPL2 and patents issue, I'm wondering if these licenses are a hardrequirement for all sub-projects and if other licenses are consideredfor use?

The statement in the charter is specifying the default. Other licensescan be used with the approval of the PMC, and in certain circumstancesthe Eclipse Foundation Board of Directors.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ee4j-community] Licensing Question
  - From: John D. Ament

References:
- [ee4j-community] Licensing Question
  - From: John D. Ament

Prev by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] Existing project of a Java EE community page at ee-central.io
Next by Date: Re: [ee4j-community] Existing project of a Java EE community page at ee-central.io
Previous by thread: [ee4j-community] Licensing Question
Next by thread: Re: [ee4j-community] Licensing Question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs