[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse-dev] [jdt-dev] Moving JDT's LTK bundlestoeclipse.platform.text?

> Indeed, moved content won't be available any more. But I don't get why this is more an issue than removing any other file in a Git repo. What makes it a possible blocker here?

Because it affects tons of files. It would be good to have a redirect in place.

Dani



From:        Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        "Eclipse JDT general developers list." <jdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:        "General development mailing list of the Eclipse project." <eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, eclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:        09.11.2017 15:25
Subject:        Re: [eclipse-dev] [jdt-dev] Moving JDT's LTK bundles        toeclipse.platform.text?
Sent by:        eclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx






On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Megert <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is a very simple and obvious example: http://git.eclipse.org/c/jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui.git/tree/org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring/pom.xml

Indeed, moved content won't be available any more. But I don't get why this is more an issue than removing any other file in a Git repo. What makes it a possible blocker here?

A Gerrit change is against a repository. If the changed project is moved, the Gerrit change won't work anymore (unless it gets fixed, as mentioned in my message).

Ok, I'll check Gerrit changes to find those which ones affect the LTK bundles. For other changes, a simple rebase would work._______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dev.eclipse.org_mailman_listinfo_eclipse-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=1UITCR5rxUZHSFczvfaNFK4ymEbEiccRX7VKchpqz0Y&m=2pV_VAHeoEGebjHyZTYr2aG1IsfqIeNOaPDourCUVR4&s=aYZmU4OZdkvmSvlNSnEMNX1M3JuKtMWmyeeCbMH5rfw&e=