Re: [eclipse-dev] [jdt-dev] Moving JDT's LTK bundlestoeclipse.platform.t

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> Indeed, moved
content won't be available any more. But I don't get why this is more an
issue than removing any other file in a Git repo. What makes it a possible
blocker here?

Because it affects tons of files. It
would be good to have a redirect in place.

Dani



From:      
 Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 "Eclipse JDT general
developers list." <jdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:      
 "General development
mailing list of the Eclipse project." <eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
jdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, eclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:      
 09.11.2017 15:25
Subject:    
   Re: [eclipse-dev]
[jdt-dev] Moving JDT's LTK bundles        toeclipse.platform.text?
Sent by:    
   eclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Megert <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Here is a very simple and obvious example:
http://git.eclipse.org/c/jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui.git/tree/org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring/pom.xml

Indeed, moved content won't be available any more. But
I don't get why this is more an issue than removing any other file in a
Git repo. What makes it a possible blocker here?

A Gerrit change is against a repository.
If the changed project is moved, the Gerrit change won't work anymore (unless
it gets fixed, as mentioned in my message).

Ok, I'll check Gerrit changes to find those which ones
affect the LTK bundles. For other changes, a simple rebase would work._______________________________________________
eclipse-dev mailing list
eclipse-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dev.eclipse.org_mailman_listinfo_eclipse-2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=1UITCR5rxUZHSFczvfaNFK4ymEbEiccRX7VKchpqz0Y&m=2pV_VAHeoEGebjHyZTYr2aG1IsfqIeNOaPDourCUVR4&s=aYZmU4OZdkvmSvlNSnEMNX1M3JuKtMWmyeeCbMH5rfw&e=