[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Migrate to EPL 2.0
|
Hi
Sorry. Forgot two details.
Before you start, send an email to the EMO notifying that you 'have'
changed. They will then update the EF database and consequently the PMI
so that the new Legal Document Generator at e.g
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/tools/documentation.php?id=modeling.mdt.ocl
provides prototype EPL 2.0 text for NOTICE and CONTRIBUTING at the root
of your repo. LICENSE comes from epl_20.html
Regards
Ed Willink
On 25/06/2018 17:59, Ed Willink wrote:
Hi Ed
I have migrated OCL, QVTd and QVTo.
I just searched and replaced "Eclipse Public License v1.0" to "Eclipse
Public License v2.0" and "http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html"
to "http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v20.html" in ALL files, since I
figure that these strings are sufficiently long that the change can be
done without more than a sampled review (e.g. in a *.genmodel
copyright element).
In a discussion on the OCL Review, Wayne was happy that a simple blast
was adequate recognizing that the increased skill and care to
correctly comment/indent the additional EPL DX line was not justified.
Wayne was also happy to leave the obsolete "All rights reserved." and
"which accompanies this distribution" text unchanged.
Even though the license change does not really merit a version change
API-wise, I decided to apply a minor increment anyway. It required
some API filtering to placate.
NB. Use a very recent version of EGIT to make sure you don't need a
coffee break while committing 5000 changes.
Regards
Ed Willink
On 25/06/2018 17:43, Ed Merks wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone started seriously looking at migrating their
project from EPL 1.0 to EPL 2.0?
The FAQ says we should:
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.60mjudroo8e5
Also, Wayne suggested that there will be pressure applied, e.g.,
perhaps a release train participation requirement.
But the FAQ doesn't say much about how to do this:
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.tci84nlsqpgw
The instructions are "So, a project can use the new version by simply
updating the file headers and notices." But how simple is that
really? Just changing all the copyright headers in all the files
sounds simple at face value.
https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/faq.php#h.q72cnghf29k0
But I have several thousand files!
Is everyone doing this or planning to do this manually, or via
various forms of scripts that we each author ourselves? Of course
we'll all diligently increment every bundle and feature version (by
the appropriate amount) remembering to keep the POMs in sync. And we
won't overlook the copyright element in each feature. Nor will we
overwrite each about.html with the new one (where is the definitive
version of that anyway?), accidentally replacing any Third Party
Content sections. To me it seems like a lot of work, made error
prone by the sheer tedium involved.
Perhaps someone else already has some experience to share?
Regards,
Ed
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev