It's unavoidable without partitioning some projects into +1/+2/+3
subprojects. Whenever a non +1 project offers something consumable
at +1 there is a problem. Xtext at +2 gives similar troubles for
OCL and probably EMF at +1.
ÂÂÂ ÂÂÂ Ed Willink
On 10/08/2017 19:02, Doug Schaefer
time with text.)
Thatâs how we got away with CDTâs build cycle. Does point
out a bit of a flaw with our offsets here. At the end of the
day, weâll build against your builds on Jenkins, not on what
you post to the downloads area, to make sure we find out
about changes early enough to recover.
Just curious, why +3?
Because the main dependency (LSP4J) is +2.
are thinking of adding a component that uses it to CDT
to access the clangd language server.
can still use it. At the moment, LSP4E tries to keep
focus on good forward and backward compatibility, so CDT
shouldn't face so much issues on release if it's using
LSP4E snapshots or milestones.
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit