[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Guava versions in Oxygen

Sam's interpretation is technically correct, but we don't do that in practice.

You only need a PB for third party content that you redistribute.

We've made some progress on eliminating PBs (at least in the OSGi context), but we're not there yet.

Wayne


On 08/05/17 03:34 PM, Ed Merks wrote:

No, my reading is that you need a PB CQ for what you redistribute.  Of course the need for a PB CQ is questionably stupid at best in the first place and I've offered to automate the whole process of tracking such dependencies.   But alas, to no avail...


On 08.05.2017 20:58, Sam Davis wrote:
Whether you need a PB is debateable. My reading of the words is that you need a PB for anything any configuration might use.

I hope that is not the correct reading because it would imply that if you have open version ranges you need a PB for every version that will ever be released in the future, since it *could* someday be used. This is of course not possible...

Sam


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation