[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Problems with Simrel contribution

Hi

On the one hand, this looks like the normal excitement that occurs when a plugin has a major version increase; every consumer must follow suit on its dependency bounds. However it is surprising that no announcement has been made, particularly so close to M6.

On the other hand, there are many plugins that re-export org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench and so they too must also incur a major version increment. org.eclipse.ui.ide is one of them and I doubt we want a major version increment there.

Presumably a typo then. I suggest nobody apart from the platform team reacts.

    Regards

        Ed Willink

On 11/03/2017 08:19, Eike Stepper wrote:
Hi,

It appears that https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/88492/ incremented the major version of the org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench plugin. There are some other commits in the context of https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484398 but none of them seems to justify a major version increment. Maybe I overlooked something historic that justifies it. Is it justifiable that the major version of this plugin was incremented, and if so, what is the justification?

At this point it looks as if clients just need to increment their upper bound.

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper



Am 11.03.2017 um 03:24 schrieb Evgeny Mandrikov:
Hello,

I'm forwarding the following thread of discussion since seems that previous messages were not delivered to the list - "being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Too many recipients to the message"

And an update on subject:
EclEmma has been re-enabled to unblock work of Andreas Sewe on https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/84521/
Papyrus really seems to be a cause of a problem, because after re-enablement all builds are still green.


Regards,
Evgeny

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Evgeny Mandrikov <mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Problems with Simrel contribution
To: Grégoire DUPE <gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Sravan K Lakkimsetti <sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx>>, jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, stepper@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx> <stepper@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>>, cedric.brun@xxxxxxx <mailto:cedric.brun@xxxxxxx> <cedric.brun@xxxxxxx <mailto:cedric.brun@xxxxxxx>>, laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx <mailto:laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx> <laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx <mailto:laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>>, lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx> <lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>>, vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx> <francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx>>, francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx> <francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>>, quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx <mailto:quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx> <quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx <mailto:quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx>>, vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx <mailto:vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx> <vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx <mailto:vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx>>, stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx> <stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx>>, Frederic Gurr <frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>



Hi,

FWIW I come to exactly the same conclusion.
And so tried to confirm by re-enabling EclEmma - https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/92766/ , validation build successful - https://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.oxygen.runaggregator.VALIDATE.gerrit/391/console


On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:24 PM Grégoire DUPE <gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Hello,

It’s looks like that the problem comes from ‘org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets’ which has the following dependency
: org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [1.2.0,2.0.0) (cf. the error message at the end of this e-mail)


    Can anybody from Papyrus check that ?

    Regards,

    Grégoire

    Cannot complete the install because of a conflicting dependency.

    Software being installed: validationSet_main 1.0.0

Only one of the following can be installed at once: [org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842,
org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239]


Cannot satisfy dependency: mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_eclipse_updates_4.7milestones_S-4.7M6-201703082000
1.0.0 depends on: org.eclipse.platform.ide 0.0.0


Cannot satisfy dependency: mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_modeling_mdt_papyrus_updates_milestones_3.0_M5_main
1.0.0 depends on: org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 3.0.0


Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group 3.0.0.201702011724 depends on:
org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets [3.0.0.201702011724]


Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets 3.0.0.201702011724 depends on: bundle
org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [1.2.0,2.0.0)


Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 3.0.0.201702011724 depends on:
org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group [3.0.0.201702011724]


Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.platform.feature.group 4.7.0.v20170308-2000 depends on: org.eclipse.ui.ide
[3.13.0.v20170306-1626]


Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.platform.ide 4.7.0.I20170308-2000 depends on:
org.eclipse.platform.feature.group [4.7.0.v20170308-2000]


Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.ui.ide 3.13.0.v20170306-1626 depends on: bundle
org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench [2.0.0,3.0.0)


Cannot satisfy dependency: validationSet_main 1.0.0 depends on:
mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_eclipse_updates_4.7milestones_S-4.7M6-201703082000 [1.0.0]


Cannot satisfy dependency: validationSet_main 1.0.0 depends on:
mappedRepo_download.eclipse.org_modeling_mdt_papyrus_updates_milestones_3.0_M5_main [1.0.0]


    Only one of the following can be installed at once:

Eclipse Workbench Model 2.0.0.v20170228-1842 (org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842)

Eclipse Workbench Model 1.3.0.v20170105-1239 (org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239)

bundle(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 2.0.0.v20170228-1842) is required by:

    ValidationSet(main)

    Contribution(Eclipse)

MappedRepository(http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.7milestones/S-4.7M6-201703082000/)

    Product(org.eclipse.platform.ide)

InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.platform.feature.group 4.7.0.v20170308-2000)

    InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.ui.ide 3.13.0.v20170306-1626)

bundle(org.eclipse.e4.ui.model.workbench 1.3.0.v20170105-1239) is required by:

    ValidationSet(main)

    Contribution(Papyrus)

MappedRepository(http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/papyrus/updates/milestones/3.0/M5/main)

    Feature(org.eclipse.papyrus.sdk.feature.feature.group 3.0.0)

InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widget.feature.feature.group 3.0.0.201702011724)

InstallableUnit(org.eclipse.papyrus.infra.widgets 3.0.0.201702011724)

*De :* Sravan K Lakkimsetti [mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:sravankumarl@xxxxxxxxxx>]
*Envoyé :* vendredi 10 mars 2017 11:33
*À :* mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx>; jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jfaltermeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:emueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
stepper@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>; cedric.brun@xxxxxxx <mailto:cedric.brun@xxxxxxx>;
laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx <mailto:laurent.goubet@xxxxxxx>; lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lorenzo.bettini@xxxxxxxxx>; vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:vincenzo.caselli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:francesco.guidieri@xxxxxxxxx>; Grégoire DUPE <gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gdupe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx <mailto:francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx>;
quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx <mailto:quentin.lemenez@xxxxxx>; vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx <mailto:vincent.lorenzo@xxxxxx>;
stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:stephaneberle9@xxxxxxxxx>; Frederic Gurr <frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:frederic.gurr@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
*Objet :* Problems with Simrel contribution


    Hi,

I am doing simrel contribution for 4.7 M6 for platform and equinox. During this process. I found that the
following projects are not compatible anymore. I have disabled these projects with my contribution. My request is
to re-enable them during your contribution to 4.7 M6.


    The projects that were disabled.

     1. EclEmma
     2. ECP
     3. EMF CDO
     4. EMF COMPARE
     5. EMF Parsley
     6. MoDisco
     7. Papyrus
     8. Sphinx

    Thanks and Regards,

    Sravan

    Sravan Kumar Lakkimsetti

    IBM India Pvt Ltd,

    Embassy Golf Links Business Park, D Block,

    Off Indiranagar-Kormangla Inner Ring Road,

    Bangalore - 560071, India

    Phone: 91-80-41776858



_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus