Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] 6 month release cycle

[Ian Bull <irbull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks a good question Mike. Obviously monthly was what Konstantin originally suggested. I think it's good in that it's forcing us to re-think some of our assumptions. In the end, if we choose 6 weeks, or 8 times per year -- with careful consideration to Holidays, etc.. -- that's fine. But if the use of the term monthly is helping us break some of our mental road-blocks, than that's a good thing(tm).

Cheers,

Ian

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Just out of curiousity, is there a reason why people keep mentioning monthly, when there is a long-established 6-week cadence?

 

Maybe we can address these issues by having a few of these monthly builds get promoted as 'Package Releases'. 

--
R. Ian Bull | EclipseSource Victoria | +1 250 477 7484
http://eclipsesource.com | http://twitter.com/eclipsesource