Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Pleased with Hudson performance and stabi

[Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ha! someone is getting snarky now :)

Of course I was just about to reply that it certainly wasn't jetty's fault :P

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx


On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Denis Roy <denis.roy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's probably Jetty's fault   :P
>
>
>
>
>
> On 09/14/2012 11:18 AM, Eike Stepper wrote:
>>
>> Hi Denis,
>>
>> with all the continous effort you're investing I hate to say it, but the
>> other minute one of my builds died with something like "Problem spawning
>> process":
>> https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/emf-cdo-integration/2336/console
>>
>> Currently I can't look up the exact message anymore because Hudson does
>> not react at all here ;-(
>>
>> Cheers
>> /Eike
>>
>> ----
>> http://www.esc-net.de
>> http://thegordian.blogspot.com
>> http://twitter.com/eikestepper
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 14.09.2012 16:58, schrieb Denis Roy:
>>>
>>> I've been quite pleased with Hudson's performance and stability recently.
>>>
>>> It's not perfect, but it is much, much better than it was a few months
>>> ago.  I think the software update and the good
>>> work Matt has done with the slaves has made a noticeable improvement.
>>>
>>> As I type this, 25 build jobs are currently running.  I find that pretty
>>> impressive.
>>>
>>> Many thanks to the Hudson team for their hard word and support, and to
>>> the volunteer Hudson admins who help keep the
>>> ball rolling.
>>>
>>> Denis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev