Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Layout and licenses

Hi,

Just to shed some lights into the issue. Gyrex requires Gemini JPA for
its EclipseLink JPA integration. Gemini JPA does not provide a p2
repository. Thus, it's in the Gyrex repo which is part of Juno.

Any ideas how to proceed?

Migrating to some external library just because Gemini isn't
participating in Juno seems wrong to me.

-Gunnar

Am 06.06.2012 15:48, schrieb Thomas Watson:
> I don't know anything about why gemini.jpa or gef3d are getting added to
> the repo, but this made me think about your question:
> 
> "If these bundles are in the repository, shouldn't the owning projects
> be Juno particpants?"
> 
> I don't know the correct answer, but it strikes me as odd that we allow
> non-eclipse third party dependencies to be added to the repo, but when
> it comes to a dependency on another project's bundles we force the other
> owning project to participate fully in the release.  What if the project
> does not want to participate?  What if there is an IP acceptable
> alternative (non-eclipse) project that could be used?  Would we prefer
> the use of that non-eclipse third party technology over the eclipse one
> simple because the owning eclipse project does not want to participate
> in the Juno release?  It seems to me that such cases should be treated
> as any other third party dependency and we should not force the owning
> project to participate in the release.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> Inactive hide details for Wayne Beaton ---06/06/2012 08:17:55 AM---Hey
> folks. I'm going through the layout and licenses reportsWayne Beaton
> ---06/06/2012 08:17:55 AM---Hey folks. I'm going through the layout and
> licenses reports today.
> 
> 
>     From:
> 
> 	
> Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>     To:
> 
> 	
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> 
>     Date:
> 
> 	
> 06/06/2012 08:17 AM
> 
>     Subject:
> 
> 	
> [cross-project-issues-dev] Layout and licenses
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> Hey folks. I'm going through the layout and licenses reports today.
> 
> I've already opened a couple of bugs regarding missing about files and
> am just starting into the licenses. These issues need to be addressed
> before any reviews can be declared successful. Note that these are very
> basic requirements that are independent of participation in the
> simultaneous release. If you need help, please ask.
> 
> There a Gemini JPA bundle in the repository. I'm also seeing a GEF3D
> bundle. Why? If these bundles are in the repository, shouldn't the
> owning projects be Juno particpants? Or did I miss a memo?
> 
> org.eclipse.gemini.jpa_1.0.99.v20120225-1927.jar
> org.eclipse.gef3d_0.8.1.v20120528-0244.jar
> 
> Who owns these bundles:
> 
> org.eclipse.rephraserengine.core_8.0.0.201205300709.jar
> org.eclipse.rephraserengine.ui_8.0.0.201205300709.jar
> 
> (I'll guess tools.ptp.photran based on the version number).
> 
> Wayne
> -- 
> Wayne Beaton
> The Eclipse Foundation
> Twitter: @waynebeaton
> Explore _Eclipse Projects_
> <http://www.eclipse.org/projects>_______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



Back to the top