Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Hudson Jetty conversion

[Kim Moir <kmoir@xxxxxxxxxx>]

The Hudson UI had been very responsive
since these changes were made.   I haven't seen any network timeouts
either when trying to contact slaves.  Kudos to all those involved
in making these improvements.  Much appreciated!

Kim



From:      
 Winston Prakash <winston.prakash@xxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:      
 02/28/2012 03:47 PM
Subject:    
   Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]
Hudson Jetty conversion
Sent by:    
   cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Let me clarify, what I meant by "bundled"
(I think the correct word is 
embedded) and "standalone".  You can use the hudson.war
two ways

Just run the war as a regular executable jar using java -jar hudson.war.
In this case it uses the jetty jars bundled with in the war and starts
an embedded jetty which in turn uses the hudson.war itself

Server server = new Server();
URL warUrl = protectionDomain.getCodeSource().getLocation();
WebAppContext context = new WebAppContext();
context.setWar(warUrl.toExternalForm());
..
server.start();

Other way (which Matt is doing now), drop the war file in a "webapps"
folder of a normal Jetty distribution.

Wondering if there is any performance difference between the above two.

- Winston

On 2/28/12 12:16 PM, Jesse McConnell wrote:
> not sure what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' really
>
> maybe osgi vs normal distribution? or embedded vs normal distribution?
>
> in those cases there shouldn't be any real default difference, osgi
> has its natural bit of classloader muckity muck muck but in terms
of
> processing of a request from start to finish...not that I know of.
>
> more info on what is meant by 'bundled' vs 'standalone' would help
> clarify that though
>
> cheers,
> jesse
>
> --
> jesse mcconnell
> jesse.mcconnell@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:08, Winston Prakash
> <winston.prakash@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/12 11:42 AM, Webmaster(Matt Ward) wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>>   I know it's short notice but as it's quiet for Hudson
this week I'm going
>>> to move us off the Winstone servlet and onto Jetty.  I've
got everything
>>> ready to go so at 4pm I'll shut Hudson down and then startup
the Jetty
>>> instance.  I expect we'll be offline for about 10 minutes.
>>
>> Nice. Good news is, for Hudson 3.0.0 we don't have to do this,
because we
>> replaced Winstone with Jetty as a bundled server.
>>
>> I'm interested to know, from Jetty folks, if there is a difference
between
>> Jetty bundled server and Standlone server in terms of performance.
>>
>> - Winston
>>
>>> -Matt.
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
>> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev