Denis,
Let us not move the job. The fix I put in hudson-test-harness
(reducing foot print of JUnit Tests) should save lot more than this
job. I request a restart during this week end and do some more heap
analysis early next week.
- Winston
On 2/23/12 7:26 AM, Denis Roy wrote:
On 02/23/2012 09:59 AM, Mickael Istria wrote:
When it is done, I'd be glad to have feedback on the overall
performance benefit of moving just one job. It's just saving
100MB on a 2GB JVM. If nothing changed, then I'll annoy to get
job is back on hudson.eclipse.org.
The background for all this is bug 367238. It is called "improve Hudson stability and
performance" and it is marked "critical". I've put a number
of bugs as dependencies to that bug. As I've mentioned,
closing only one of the blockers will not fix the issue, but
when a job consumes 10x the amount of RAM of other jobs, it is
clearly misbehaving.
Let's resume this discussion on the appropriate bugs. Thanks.
Denis
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
|
