[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fwd: [sequoyah-dev] Question about Indigo requirements for Sequoyah
|
Hi John,
Thanks for your considerations.
We are considering that the requisite is ok now. :)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 16:52, John Arthorne
<John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the component is not part of the Indigo
release, then the requirement doesn't seem applicable any more.
For what it's worth, I think the intent
of the requirement is that you open a bug not just to document the internals,
but to describe how the use of internals will be removed. For example,
enter a bug against p2 requesting that they add the API you need.
John
Good morning all,
we got no responses from our mailing list, so I would
like to ask you guys if anyone could help us with the question below.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marcel Gorri <wmg040@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 15:18
Subject: [sequoyah-dev] Question about Indigo requirements for Sequoyah
To: Sequoyah Developers <sequoyah-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Mobile Industry Working Group <mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi all,
one of every Simultaneous Release set of requirements
is: "Projects should leverage
only published APIs of dependencies". When
this requirement can't be accomplished for some reason, the standard procedure
is to open a bug and justify this situation.
Ok, we had this situation in Sequoyah for Helios release
due the SDK Discovery view from Pulsar, which had to use some internal
APIs from P2. By that time, we opened a bug (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=307883)
to justify it.
Now, my question is: since Pulsar is not available for
Indigo (at least this is the status so far), can we consider that this
exception case is not applicable for Sequoyah anymore? (even though considering
that Pulsar code is still in Sequoyah repository).
One more thing: we closed this bug, when it should have
remained open. If we identify that this exception is still necessary, we
can reopen the bug.
Tks,
Marcel
_______________________________________________
sequoyah-dev mailing list
sequoyah-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoyah-dev
--
Thanks,
Daniel Pastore
Sequoyah Team
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
Thanks,
Daniel Pastore
Sequoyah Team