Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Fwd: [sequoyah-dev] Question about Indigo requirements for Sequoyah

Hi John,

Thanks for your considerations.
We are considering that the requisite is ok now. :)

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 16:52, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the component is not part of the Indigo release, then the requirement doesn't seem applicable any more.

For what it's worth, I think the intent of the requirement is that you open a bug not just to document the internals, but to describe how the use of internals will be removed. For example, enter a bug against p2 requesting that they add the API you need.

John




Daniel Pastore <kpqb38@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

03/14/2011 08:50 AM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[cross-project-issues-dev] Fwd: [sequoyah-dev] Question about        Indigo requirements for Sequoyah





Good morning all,

we got no responses from our mailing list, so I would like to ask you guys if anyone could help us with the question below.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marcel Gorri <
wmg040@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 15:18
Subject: [sequoyah-dev] Question about Indigo requirements for Sequoyah
To: Sequoyah Developers <
sequoyah-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mobile Industry Working Group <mobile-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Hi all, 


one of every Simultaneous Release set of requirements is: "Projects should leverage only published APIs of dependencies". When this requirement can't be accomplished for some reason, the standard procedure is to open a bug and justify this situation.

Ok, we had this situation in Sequoyah for Helios release due the SDK Discovery view from Pulsar, which had to use some internal APIs from P2. By that time, we opened a bug (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=307883) to justify it. 

Now, my question is: since Pulsar is not available for Indigo (at least this is the status so far), can we consider that this exception case is not applicable for Sequoyah anymore? (even though considering that Pulsar code is still in Sequoyah repository). 

One more thing: we closed this bug, when it should have remained open. If we identify that this exception is still necessary, we can reopen the bug.

Tks,
 Marcel





_______________________________________________
sequoyah-dev mailing list

sequoyah-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sequoyah-dev




--
Thanks,

Daniel Pastore

Sequoyah Team
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




--
Thanks,

Daniel Pastore
Sequoyah Team


Back to the top