[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [Maven/Tycho] Suggested groupId
|
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 06:49:13 pm Jesse McConnell wrote:
> normal people use org.eclipse.<project> as the groupId and an
> artifactId of something like jetty-server
>
> anything other then that is not following normal maven conventions...
sounds good to me, but ...
> that being said there has been discussion about using that
> org.eclipse:org.eclipse.jetty.jetty-server:<version> notation to allow
> for reverse mappings to bundles...
The last part seems to refer to statements like Jason's in
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=288644#c3
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=288644#c8
E.g.,
"org.eclipse.<project> Would definitely not be better. We've already discussed
this at length and having a 1:1 mapping of artifactId to symbolic bundle name
is the only way we can deterministically map between the two systems. Take a
non-constant groupId and you can't correctly determine the symbolic bundle
name."
Is anybody inclined to resolve this conflict, or will every project just do as it pleases?
best,
Stephan
