Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [Maven/Tycho] Suggested groupId

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

See also

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=288644
"Decide of group ids for Eclipse Maven artifacts"

Thanks,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

 

---

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Mittwoch, 10. November 2010 18:06
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [Maven/Tycho] Suggested groupId

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Mickael Istria <mickael.istria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

Hi all,

I am working a little bit on trying Tycho for SWTBot build. And I got a question of "good practice", if good practices with Tycho already exist. The question is: What should be the groupId ?
IMHO, the groupId should reflect the Bundle-Vendor / Provider attribute, and AFAIAA the release train says the Provider should "Eclipse.org - [Project]", for example "Eclipse.org - SWTBot". Then, I'd go for org.eclipse.swtbot. Does this sound good, or should I prefer org.eclipse ?

In EGit/JGit land we use 'org.eclipse.<project>'

  <groupId>org.eclipse.egit</groupId>

  <artifactId>egit-parent</artifactId>

So I'm for that approach. 

-- 
Cheers,

Chris Aniszczyk
http://aniszczyk.org
+1 860 839 
2465