Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] why same feature qualifier for org.eclips

[Thomas Hallgren <thomas@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Nicloas,

Indeed. Y is greater then X so the versions go backwards. I think you should enter a bugzilla for this. It's rather serious given that everything is mixed in a composite.

- thomas



On 11/10/2010 11:48 AM, Nicolas Bros wrote:

Hi,

I'm having dependency problems in the MoDisco Buckminster build for Indigo M3, and I'm searching why.

Buckminster materializes plug-ins both from M2a and M3, leading to conflicts.

I found this in the composite platform update site :

S-3.7M1-201008051700/features/org.eclipse.sdk_3.7.0.v20100629-7Q7t-DPY2lXAsz0ngujjWy0i17bPiZUwAz0A8mqupM3lG.jar

S-3.7M2a-201009211024/features/org.eclipse.sdk_3.7.0.v20100629-7Q7t-DPY2mYAyjigmrpYEb4Q44gPf5Y-94Wa22bALqtMJ.jar

S-3.7M3-201010281441/features/org.eclipse.sdk_3.7.0.v20100629-7Q7t-DPX2naDL1jfutmm2idmoY-eH81sz-yIoQxy-Yeup.jar

Why do all 3 features have the same date (20100629)?

Following the alphabetical order, 3.7M2a is last, so p2 would consider it the most recent I believe.

--
Nicolas Bros
R&D
tel: 06 75 09 19 88
nbros@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
nbros.mia@xxxxxxxxx
Mia-Software, 410 clos de la Courtine
93160 Noisy-le-Grand
http://www.mia-software.com
.: model driven agility :.

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev