Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] How is the installer content determined?

Hi,

I'm not certain. Arguments can be made that EclipseLink is both runtime (server-side) and development, since the libraries are needed for developed applications to run and they are also needed at development time to create said applications. I don't know the criteria Eclipse uses to make the determination.

So, I'd think that either "*Web, XML, and Java EE Development" *or* "**EclipseRT Target Platform Components**" *would be correct. Since we are part of the RT project I went with that initially. In addition, it sounded like the RT was part of the base configuration - which made sense because other plugins were planning on depending upon EclipseLink functionality.

Furthermore, the wiki sites stated that the categories were used for the p2 site. Nothing was mentioned about their being used to determine the package a project was organized into. If they are used for both, then it seems I need to change to the former category.

-Eric


Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Hi Eric,
I see several EclipseLink features under the "EclipseRT Target Platform Components" category. I would have expected "Database Development". Did you use the wrong category in your eclipselink.build file?

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


Eric Gwin wrote:
Hi,

Our project is in the Galileo build. However, after downloading M7, we find that it is not in the installer. I've done a quick review of the build pages, but didn't see answer. Is there a control file somewhere I missed updating?

Thanks.

-Eric
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev



Back to the top