Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] SDK's on Galileo?


Hey Martin...

The SDK version in DTP's case includes source. The non-SDK version in DTP's case does not. And we really don't have a "runtime" component persay.

There's an open bug on our side for discussing our current distribution (i.e. SDK = source, non-SDK = no source) to add a third option (frameworks or runtime) that doesn't include source or any of the tools for developing DTP extensions. But that didn't get anywhere for this release.

--Fitz

Brian Fitzpatrick
Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
Eclipse Data Tools Platform Connectivity Team Lead
Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.



"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/11/2009 07:19 AM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
"Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[cross-project-issues-dev] SDK's on Galileo?





Hi all,
 
I notice that there is "PDT SDK" and "DTP SDK" on Galileo, but not the corresponding runtimes.
 
As an end user, I'm not interested in the SDK bits of PDT and DTP. Could you folks contribute the
runtime features as well?
 
I remember that in Ganymede, we tried to avoid SDK's on the coordinated site. Is there any
guideline for SDK's on Galileo? I'd propose a guideline that just contributing an SDK without
the respective runtime should be deprecated.
 
Thoughts?
 
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 _______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


Back to the top