| Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Plans for Galileo Build |
|
Hi Oisin, Oisin Hurley wrote: Glad to hear that you were able to run it. I guess this was on a Mac?The new build is well documented at http://wiki.eclipse.org/Buckminster_Galileo_BuilderWorks well for headless -verifyOnly at least - I made a small correction to the builder app name on the wiki page. Yes. The OS/WS/ARCH are all enums in the ecore 'Build' model and win32, win32, x86 happens to be the the default setting. I wouldn't be surprised if the editor actually senses that and hence, creates the empty <config/> element for that particular config.One thing to note - if you keep the <configs/> line in the galileo.build file, it will default to processing a win32.win32.x86 configuration. A run using -logLevel DEBUG might tell you more about the cause of the error. I say might, because sometimes the information about the cause is simply gone and all that's left is the "Problems loading artifact:" exception. The p2 team is continuously improving the error propagation so we might see better output here in the near future.When I do a full mirror build (which took 339 minutes) I get a lot of whines about not being able to download some artifacts, for example: - mirroring artifact org.eclipse.update.feature,org.eclipse.rse.dstore,3.1.0.v200902011800-7L4BhEVVFGJFjK8HORO Unable to unpack artifact org.eclipse.update.feature,org.eclipse.rse.dstore,3.1.0.v200902011800-7L4BhEVVFGJFjK8HORO in repository file:/Users/ohurley/Projects/osstools/galileo/buckbuilder-tryout/build/mirror: Problems downloading artifact: org.eclipse.update.feature,org.eclipse.rse.dstore,3.1.0.v200902011800-7L4BhEVVFGJFjK8HORO. I'm tempted to assume that this is a network transient issue, rather than anything wrong with the particular contributions or with the builder, since David and Thomas have managed full builds. Thank you kindly for you warm words :-)I'd like to echo David's words of thanks to Rich and add my own to Thomas for this build facility - good stuff guys! Now, if we could just create an Xtext editor based on the build model, we wouldn't need to use XMI anymore ;) - thomas |