Brian,
The Galileo branding question is a good one. I’ve cc’d the cross-project list
so that others can benefit from the answer.
Please see the Galileo Requirements[1], and the bug[2] that
drove the idea.
There is a “must do” which states:
Each major project (as determined
by participating PMCs) should have an About dialog icon with descriptive text
(e.g. provider name = "Eclipse Modeling Project" and not simply
Eclipse.org) and contribute to the welcome page.
It is important that the provider name start with “Eclipse”.
E.g. “Eclipse Data Tools Platform Project”
Does this answer the question?
[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Galileo#Requirements_For_Participation
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=198941
Mike Milinkovich
Office: +1.613.224.9461 x228
Mobile: +1.613.220.3223
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: March-19-09 11:12 AM
To: license@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Question about DTP branding in Galileo
Hi there...
John Graham
mentioned we should check with you guys about the Branding requirement in
Galileo. It states that we're supposed to change the provider name from
Eclipse.org to something more specific, like "Data Tools Platform" in
our case.
Is this truly
the case? John wondered if this was a change in Eclipse Foundation policy?
Thanks
--Fitz
Brian Fitzpatrick
Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
Eclipse Data Tools Platform Connectivity Team Lead
Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.
-----
Forwarded by Brian Fitzpatrick/SYBASE on 03/19/2009 08:11 AM -----
John
Graham <jgraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
03/19/2009
08:08 AM
|
To
|
brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx
|
cc
|
Linda
Chan <LChan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Payton <bpayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
Subject
|
RE:
Question about DTP branding in Galileo
|
|
> the provider to "Data Tools
Platform" is what's appropriate in our
case
Really? If so, then that is a change in Eclipse Foundation policy. I'd
check with license@xxxxxxxxxxx first.
I believe the only thing we need is a distinct icon.
-- John
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 07:51 -0700, brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> After chatting with David Williams yesterday, it appears that changing
> the provider to "Data Tools Platform" is what's appropriate
in our
> case. But since we don't really have a custom icon for us, he said it
> would be ok to pass on that part of the requirement for another
> release.
>
> In addition, it appears we need to contribute to the main welcome
> page, which has some APIs/extension points, but we're not sure how to
> use them.
>
> I'm going to post a note on the cross project list to see if anyone
> can help by pointing to a reference or example of how to do the
> welcome page integration.
>
> --Fitz
>
> Brian Fitzpatrick
> Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
> Eclipse Data Tools Platform Connectivity Team Lead
> Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.
>
>
>
> "Linda Chan" <LChan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 03/18/2009 11:30 AM
>
>
> To
> <brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Brian Payton"
<bpayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> <jgraham@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject
> RE: Question
> about DTP
> branding in
> Galileo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If they are referring to the feature and plugin's provider name, all
> the DTP feature projects and plugins have "Eclipse.org".
> See below screen shots.
> Maybe we should get some clarification first if it is indeed this
> "Provider" field that needs changes.
>
> Linda
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From: brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 10:39 AM
> To: Brian Payton
> Cc: jgraham@xxxxxxxxxx; Linda Chan
> Subject: Re: Question about DTP branding in Galileo
>
>
> Yeah... That's kind of what I'm thinking as well.
>
> Brian Fitzpatrick
> Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
> Eclipse Data Tools Platform Connectivity Team Lead
> Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.
>
>
> Brian Payton <bpayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 03/18/2009 10:37 AM
>
>
>
> To
> brian.fitzpatrick@xxxxxxxxxx
> cc
> jgraham@xxxxxxxxxx, LChan@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject
> Re: Question
> about DTP
> branding in
> Galileo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Fitz,
>
> From the wording given, it doesn't say that the *icon* has to be
> different from the Eclipse one, only the *text* has to not be
> Eclipse.org (which I assume it already is). So we might be OK as
is.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
>
> Brian Payton
> SQL and XML Query Tools Development
> IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory
> (408) 463-2989, T/L 8-543-2989
>
>
>
> Question about DTP branding in
> Galileo
>
>
>
> brian.fitzpatrick
> to:
> Brian
> Payton,
> LChan,
> jgraham
> 03/18/2009 07:59 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> Hey guys...
>
> There's this "must do" for the release train in Galileo that
has to do
> with branding...
>
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=254286
>
> It has a pretty vague description:
>
> "Each major project (as determined by participating PMCs) should
have
> an About dialog icon with descriptive text (e.g. provider name =
> "Eclipse Modeling Project" and not simply Eclipse.org) and
contribute
> to the welcome page."
>
> We already have an About icon and text I believe... Xiaoying says
"DTP
> currently uses the same about icon as the Eclipse platform team."
>
> Do we need to do anything more with this? We already contribute a
> Welcome page I believe.
>
> --Fitz
>
> Brian Fitzpatrick
> Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
> Eclipse Data Tools Platform Connectivity Team Lead
> Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.