Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo Must Do's: How much Rules? - Resu

[Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ed,

Just for the record, as a former Technology project lead I approached 
Rich and the tech PMCs at ESE about the input from technology projects 
on the Planning Council.  I'm not sure if the Technology PMCs 
subsequently provided input...but I guess not.

And given input from Thomas and others about community needs, I'm still 
wondering:  why are the number of these must-dos being *increased*?

Scott


Ed Merks wrote:
> Randy,
>
> Apparently none of the PMC leads of any of the top-level projects were 
> approached by any subproject lead with any concerns about the Galileo 
> must-do's.  As such, the collective silence is interpreted as 
> pervasive tacit agreement.  At the PC council meeting, we even added 
> one more must do: change each plugin.properties and feature.properties 
> to something more descriptive than:
>
>     providerName=Eclipse.org
>
> For modeling we're changing it to
>
>     providerName=Eclipse Modeling Project
>
> Note that there is a general expectation that PMC leads will 
> communicate these issues planning with their subproject leads.  If 
> that isn't happening, i.e., if the above issue is a surprise for you, 
> then it's time to reestablish your communication channels with your 
> PMC leads.
>
> Cheers,
> Ed
>
>
> Randy Hudson wrote:
> > Is this another poll?
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > -Randy
> >
> >
> >
> >                                                                            
> >              Thomas Hallgren                                               
> >              <thomas@xxxxxxx>                                              
> >              Sent by:                                                   To 
> >              cross-project-iss         Cross project issues                
> >              ues-dev-bounces@e         <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.o 
> >              clipse.org                rg>                                 
> >                                                                         cc 
> >                                                                            
> >              11/27/2008 11:11                                      Subject 
> >              AM                        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]      
> >                                        Galileo Must Do's: How much Rules?	- 
> >                                        Results are in                      
> >              Please respond to                                             
> >                Cross project                                               
> >                   issues                                                   
> >              <cross-project-is                                             
> >              sues-dev@eclipse.                                             
> >                    org>                                                    
> >                                                                            
> >                                                                            
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
> >
> >       35 people participated, the majority voting for "Guidance" through
> >       rules and "Ok to have rules since we all gain from the train". Looks
> >       like the PC is doing the right thing after all. Thanks, Planning
> >       Council!
> > Maybe that is jumping to conclusions? Don't forget that there are over 900
> > committers that didn't vote at all. What does that mean?
> >
> > a) They didn't vote because they all agree with PMC's decisions
> > b) They didn't vote because they want to spend as little time as possible
> > on rules and bureaucracy
> >
> > My guess would be the latter for the most part and that the 35 that did
> > vote have an interest in this that is way above average.
> >
> > Just my 0.02$
> >
> > Thomas Hallgren
> > _______________________________________________
> > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> > cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> > cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> >   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
>