Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Galileo Must Do's: How much Rules? - Results are in

Randy,

Apparently none of the PMC leads of any of the top-level projects were approached by any subproject lead with any concerns about the Galileo must-do's.  As such, the collective silence is interpreted as pervasive tacit agreement.  At the PC council meeting, we even added one more must do: change each plugin.properties and feature.properties to something more descriptive than:
providerName=Eclipse.org
For modeling we're changing it to
providerName=Eclipse Modeling Project
Note that there is a general expectation that PMC leads will communicate these issues planning with their subproject leads.  If that isn't happening, i.e., if the above issue is a surprise for you, then it's time to reestablish your communication channels with your PMC leads.

Cheers,
Ed


Randy Hudson wrote:
Is this another poll?

;-)

-Randy



                                                                           
             Thomas Hallgren                                               
             <thomas@xxxxxxx>                                              
             Sent by:                                                   To 
             cross-project-iss         Cross project issues                
             ues-dev-bounces@e         <cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.o 
             clipse.org                rg>                                 
                                                                        cc 
                                                                           
             11/27/2008 11:11                                      Subject 
             AM                        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]      
                                       Galileo Must Do's: How much Rules?	- 
                                       Results are in                      
             Please respond to                                             
               Cross project                                               
                  issues                                                   
             <cross-project-is                                             
             sues-dev@eclipse.                                             
                   org>                                                    
                                                                           
                                                                           




Oberhuber, Martin wrote:

      35 people participated, the majority voting for "Guidance" through
      rules and "Ok to have rules since we all gain from the train". Looks
      like the PC is doing the right thing after all. Thanks, Planning
      Council!
Maybe that is jumping to conclusions? Don't forget that there are over 900
committers that didn't vote at all. What does that mean?

a) They didn't vote because they all agree with PMC's decisions
b) They didn't vote because they want to spend as little time as possible
on rules and bureaucracy

My guess would be the latter for the most part and that the 35 that did
vote have an interest in this that is way above average.

Just my 0.02$

Thomas Hallgren
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev


_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
  

Back to the top