RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5 problems

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: New Page 1

No,

 

it actually looks like the schudle has been just fine.

I should have written "It's a pity that I did not start trying to get Ganymede as a whole earlier".

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

---

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 17:43
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5 problems

Hmm - it looks to me that we're right on schedule vis a vis what we had decided for all the +1s, +2s, etc. The schedule says: "M5 +3 20 Feb" (yesterday) and we had a green build yesterday so are you suggesting that the schedule should have been more aggressive?

Oberhuber, Martin wrote:

it's a pity that it took so long until a green build was available.

--
[end of message]