[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[cross-project-issues-dev] Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Europa Fall Maintenance still in progress?
|
This is a very good question indeed.
3.3.1.1 for the platform is an emergency fixpack to address a couple
regressions caused by 3.3.1.
I would hope that the corresponding Europa update meets the same criteria.
If a fix is not absolutely critical, then it can probably wait for the
normal Winter update.
So my personal vote would be to avoid introducing more changes than we have
to (unless we are asking for troubles).
"Nick Boldt"
<codeslave@xxxxxx
.com> To
Sent by: "eclipse.org-planning-council"
eclipse.org-plann <eclipse.org-planning-council@eclip
ing-council-bounc se.org>
es@xxxxxxxxxxx cc
Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@eclipse.o
24/10/2007 20:40 rg>
Subject
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council]
Please respond to Europa Fall Maintenance still in
"eclipse.org-plan progress?
ning-council"
<eclipse.org-plan
ning-council@ecli
pse.org>
I've been publishing our 3.3.x stream builds (EMF 2.3.x) to the Europa
site based on the assumption they would be contributed to the eventual
Winter Maintenance. I can easily back these commits out when/if we get
the green light for 3.3.1.1 and the EFMv2 build.
Or, can there be two branches of Europa sites? One for fall contribs
and one for winter?
As an aside, are we no longer cross-posting these messages to
cross-projects-issues-dev@? Increasingly it seems like the planning
council list is used more than the old cross-projects list. Does the
planning council not need its own list for planning council
discussions not related to Europa/Ganymede?
Nick
On 10/24/07, Mik Kersten <beatmik@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Mylyn is not currently planning on updating our Europa Fall Update
features.
> However, just in case it would be good to know what the 3.3.1.1 release
and
> EPP bundling schedule is, e.g. by adding a line to:
>
>
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Europa#Coordinated_Maintenance
>
>
>
> Mik
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:11 AM
> To: eclipse.org-planning-council
> Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Europa Fall Maintenance
still
> in progress?
>
>
>
>
> Hmm....
>
>
>
> thanks for the explanation, Bjorn.
>
>
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to decide about at least potentially promoting
or
> not BEFORE we all silently update our features?
>
> Because if we decide in the end to not promote anything in the end, quite
> some work will have been in vain...
>
>
>
> I, personally, think it's a good idea to re-spin at least together with
the
> Platform's re-spin such that we have
>
> a full-blown New Europa Fall Maintenance in the end.
>
>
>
> I'm also OK with re-spinning Maintenance more often, even though this
makes
> the build non-reproducable
>
> (what would "the maintenance release" then be after all... bug reports
and
> the like would need to include
>
> a date at which the build was taken).
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber
> Wind River Systems, Inc.
> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:54 PM
> To: eclipse.org-planning-council
> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Europa Fall Maintenance
still
> in progress?
>
> I guess I should add: this is the same that we did at the beginning of
July:
> the mechanism to re-spin the build was used, but in the end we decided
not
> to promote it to the download site. We may choose to do the same, or not,
> this time.
>
> Oberhuber, Martin wrote: Hi all,
>
> there have been discussions about re-spinning
> Europa Fall Maintenance -- potentially with
> the Re-spin of Eclipse 3.3.1.1 that's ongoing.
>
> I wanted to also be on the train, and updated
> the features-dsdp-tm.xml with some patches
> we've made in the meantime.
>
> When I synchronized, I noticed that 10 other
> projects also seem to have updated their features.
>
> Do we have some silent agreement that Europa
> Maintenance is being re-spun periodically? Or
> is this a one-time special case?
> I'm OK with either, I was just surprised since
> we had that discussion beginning of July, and
> decided at that time to not do it...
>
> What does the Community think? Or did I miss
> any decision that's been made?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber
> Wind River Systems, Inc.
> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> [end of message]
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
>
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
