[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Agenda for tomorrow's call?
|
Descriptions of the scripts that the
platform teams uses for signing are here
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/JAR_Signing
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Platform-releng-signedbuild
We have been using packed jars since
early 2006. We have been using signed bulds since shortly after 3.3
M3. As is the case with the implementation of any new technology,
there are bugs that will arise and need to be worked through. Having
a larger number of teams packing and signing their jars will result in
a more solid implementation that accounts for a broader range of use cases.
Kim
"Oberhuber, Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
12/19/2006 08:02 AM
Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [cross-project-issues-dev] Agenda for
tomorrow's call? |
|
Hi all,
do we have a (Wiki based?) agenda
for tomorrow's call?
The one item that I'd like to
discuss is the usage of pack200 & sign for the Europa site.
* Should we all pack & sign
already?
* Where are the scripts for pack
& sign that the platform is using?
We've had bad problems with pack200
and signing, especially when nested jars are involved. My feeling is that
signed-and-packed jars are not yet ready for general consumption. See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163421
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168344
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kim
Moir
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 6:35 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] added 3.3M4 feature versions to
Europa
I've added our 3.3M4 features to org.eclipse.europa.tools/build-home/features-ep.xml.
Since the Europa "Should Do" item #5 mentions the need to provide
SDK features, I've included the SDK feature in the list of features to
be copied to the update site.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Europa_Simultaneous_Release#Must_Do
Given this point, has the starting zip has changed for Europa? With
Callisto, I made a page each milestone that listed all the platform runtimes
to download for inclusion on the Callisto site. Is the starting point
for users who download Europa projects with update manager going to be
the platform runtime zip or the SDK? I recall last time that there
were some concerns with advising people to start with the SDK because it's
a larger download which consumes more bandwidth and many people don't use
the source anyways.
Kim_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev