[cross-project-issues-dev] Agenda for tomorrow's call?

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all,

 

do we have a (Wiki based?) agenda for tomorrow's call?

 

The one item that I'd like to discuss is the usage of pack200 & sign for the Europa site.

* Should we all pack & sign already?

* Where are the scripts for pack & sign that the platform is using?

 

We've had bad problems with pack200 and signing, especially when nested jars are involved. My feeling is that signed-and-packed jars are not yet ready for general consumption. See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=163421

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=168344

 

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

---

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kim Moir
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 6:35 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] added 3.3M4 feature versions to Europa

I've added our 3.3M4 features to org.eclipse.europa.tools/build-home/features-ep.xml.  

Since the Europa "Should Do" item #5 mentions the need to provide SDK features, I've included the SDK feature in the list of features to be copied to the update site.  
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Europa_Simultaneous_Release#Must_Do

Given this point, has the starting zip has changed for Europa?  With Callisto, I made a page each milestone that listed all the platform runtimes to download for inclusion on the Callisto site.  Is the starting point for users who download Europa projects with update manager going to be the platform runtime zip or the SDK?  I recall last time that there were some concerns with advising people to start with the SDK because it's a larger download which consumes more bandwidth and many people don't use the source anyways.

Kim