Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Inconsistent packaging of epl_v10.html an

[Randy Hudson <hudsonr@xxxxxxxxxx>]

All GEF ZIPs contain the EPL file and
an older version of notice.html which was then named license.html.  They
are located in /eclipse/features/org.eclipse.gef.*/*.html.
Obviously we should pick up the newer
file (March, 2005), but is it necessary to move the files to the root eclipse
directory? It seems to make more sense to keep licenses with the feature,
and it avoids the overwrite issue.

-Randy

Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/17/2006 12:42 PM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Inconsistent packaging of epl_v10.html        and notice.html in Eclipse project zips

To follow up on this, I spoke with Janet Campbell who confirmed that the
epl_v10.html and notice.html files must be included in every package (zip)
distributed by Eclipse. I've opened bugs against the projects that do not
currently include these files in their zips. 

The specifics of the bugs I opened can be found in bug 135951.

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx

Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

05/04/2006 06:20 PM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[cross-project-issues-dev] Inconsistent packaging of epl_v10.html and notice.html in Eclipse project zips

When installing several projects I noticed that some project downloads
contain the files epl_v10.html and notice.html in the eclipse directory
while others
don't. For example, the Eclipse IDE, releng tools and EMF contain these
files. GEF, JEM and WTP do not contain these files.

When unzipping the projects into the Eclipse home directory, the zips that
contain the licence and notice files prompt me to overwrite them. This
seems like a mistake as I don't think I should ever overwrite license information
but may in fact be the correct packaging for Eclipse project zips.

The projects that are part of the Callisto release should be consistent
in their packaging. Should project zips contain the epl_v10.html and notice.html
files in their eclipse directory? If yes, it looks like several projects
will need to add these files for the Callisto release. If no, at least
a couple projects will need to remove these files for Callisto.

This issue is being tracked in bug 135951. I've posted to this list as
per Kim's suggestion. 

Thanks, 

Lawrence Mandel

Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814   Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@xxxxxxxxxx_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev