Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] SessionType

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vladimir Prus [mailto:vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 12:39 PM
>> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Marc Khouzam
>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] SessionType
>>
>> I am becoming somewhat concerned :-( You seem to suggest that
>> overridding a service -- that is, writing my own service class
>> and doing what I want -- is a sensible approach.
>
> Yes.  That's DSF.

And I'll never forget the day we learned about DSF and were told that.
I was floored. It is not a sensible approach and one of the main
reasons I still don't like DSF (the complex asynchronous programming
model being the other one). If you want DSF to have a higher adoption
rate, this needs to be addressed.

Doug.