[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Newsgroup Home]
|
[news.eclipse.webtools] Help with WSDL validation error
|
Hello!
After creating a WSDL from a Java class using Axis2 1.3 Eclipse plugin,
I get a WSDL file on which Eclipse gives me a validation error:
src-resolve.4.2: Error resolving component
'ns0:FailedConfigurationException'. It was detected that
'ns0:FailedConfigurationException' is in namespace
'http://ticketFramework.webservice.cardinis.com/xsd', but components
from this namespace are not referenceable from schema document
'file:///C:/<complete-path>/WEB-INF/services/accessServices/META-INF/accessServices.wsdl'.
If this is the incorrect namespace, perhaps the prefix of
'ns0:FailedConfigurationException' needs to be changed. If this is the
correct namespace, then an appropriate 'import' tag should be added to
'file:///C:/<complete-path>/WEB-INF/services/accessServices/META-INF/accessServices.wsdl'.
What does this error mean? Why is it given?
This is a fragment of the WSDL:
<wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:axis2="http://access.webservice.cardinis.cardinis.com"
xmlns:ns1="http://access.webservice.cardinis.cardinis.com/xsd"
xmlns:wsaw="http://www.w3.org/2006/05/addressing/wsdl"
xmlns:http="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/http/"
xmlns:ns0="http://ticketFramework.webservice.cardinis.com/xsd"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
xmlns:soap12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/"
targetNamespace="http://access.webservice.cardinis.cardinis.com">
<wsdl:types>
<xs:schema
xmlns:ax21="http://ticketFramework.webservice.cardinis.com/xsd"
attributeFormDefault="qualified" elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://ticketFramework.webservice.cardinis.com/xsd">
<xs:complexType name="FailedConfigurationException">
<xs:complexContent>
<xs:extension base="ns1:Exception">
<xs:sequence />
</xs:extension>
</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>
[...]
Any suggestion would be really appreciated.
Mauro.