[news.eclipse.tools] Re: The static field xxx.yyy should be accessed in

["Bob Foster" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ages ago, not long after the feature was first introduced. I don't recall
ever seeing a comment after the initial bug report.

The problem, from day one, seems to be that the parse that produces the
markings is done in a separate thread, but it is not correctly verified that
the most recent parse corresponds to the most recent version of the text.

Bob

"Philippe Mulet" <philippe_mulet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b7ou6h$ugn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Did you enter a bug report for it ?
> "Bob Foster" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:b7op7a$qrh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > "Philippe Mulet" <philippe_mulet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:b7okek$ns8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > As said in a different post, this extra warning can always be
disabled,
> > and
> > > we could argue about the default value for this (we did ask people on
> > > jdt-core-dev mailing list a while ago about these defaults).
> >
> > This is amusing. If someone asks a usage question one one of these lists
> > they are directed to the newsgroups, but when you want an opinion on
> default
> > usage, you ask the list. ;-}
> >
> > Personally, I wish less attention went to stuff like this and more to
> fixing
> > those annoying bugs that have been around since the early 2.0
milestones.
> > Like, I'm really tired of staring at my screen trying to figure out why
> > those red squiggles are there, only to discover that some code just
forgot
> > to erase them.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
>
>