[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
|
[news.eclipse.tools] Re: I disagree
|
- From: winghong@xxxxxxxxxx (Wing Hong Ho)
- Date: 7 Aug 2001 14:16:40 GMT
- Newsgroups: eclipse.tools
- Organization: http://www.eclipse.org
- User-agent: NewsPortal 0.23
I agree with Randy.
I do appreciate the fact that for very simple GUIs SWT is pretty good. It
does have the native look-and-feel (which I think is extremely important
-- Swing just don't look right).
However, it is very difficult right now to implement feature-rich GUIs in
SWT. For example, Swing tables have the concept of "cell renderers",
whereas in SWT all you will get is an icon and a label. I came from Swing
and I miss a lot of the nice concepts and features in Swing widgets that
just aren't there in SWT. I have also been struggling put multi-line text
in an SWT table.
Lastly, writing GUI code with a source editor is truly archaic. I miss
the VCE in VA Java and I could have written some of the GUIs in there 10x
faster can I can using a source editor.
Randy Hudson wrote:
> Actually, you shouldn't be building you UI's with a source editor at all.
> You should be using a UI tool, like VA-Java's composition editor or
> JBuilder. And in that case, there is no support for SWT at all.
> Read some of the above threads. Developer can't even get tab traversal to
> work with SWT. Layout support is about 10 times more powerful in AWT, but
> admittedly, I wouldn't touch GridBagLayout without VA-Java up my sleeve.