[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Newsgroup Home]
|
[news.eclipse.tools.pdt] Re: PDT falling behind on purpose?
|
- From: Nick Boldt <codeslave@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:16:29 -0400
- Newsgroups: eclipse.tools.pdt
- Organization: EclipseCorner
- User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071113)
Try this for an experiment:
i. Offer to fix a bug in both projects, and see who takes you up on the
offer. (Or ask both projects to participate in Bug Day[1], then sign up.)
ii. After a few contributions (bug reports, wiki contributions, patch
submissions) to either / both projects, ask to be made a committer. See
what happens.
IMHO, the project that encourages and accepts contributions from the
community and fosters committer diversity is the one that deserves the
bigger adopter community.
The two camps are not about to join forces any time soon. But you can
offer to join one or both to help them out and build a better PHP dev
experience for yourself and for others.
Nick
[1]http://wiki.eclipse.org/BugDay#2008
Michael Spector wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
A lot of time was spent TRYING to get PHPEclipse adopted as the PHP
platform for Eclipse - and I spent time on that exercise, but
'commercial interests' have a bigger pull :(
IMAGINE where PHPEclipse would be today if one tenth of the time spent
reinventing it in PDT and been spent simply improving it?
I don't understand why cannot these two projects coexist? Why not let
people choose preferable IDE as long as each of these IDE has its own
features? Lets hundreds of volunteers from over the world work hard on
both projects in order to make them better - the final decision will be
up to user!