On 2008-01-30, Ed Merks <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Lehmeier wrote:
On 2008-01-30, Ed Merks <merks@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When I generate an ecore metamodel from a km3 file, the ecore model still
lacks a nsURI and a nsPrefix for all packages.
That's a bummer. Even EMOF package are supposed to specify a namespace
URI. It would seem better if tools always generate a well formed Ecore
instance...
Again, if at least it generated instance class name like
java.lang.String as a default, at least the model would be well formed...
Perhaps you should open a bugzilla. It sounds kind of incomplete.
No, this was intentional.
See: http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/KM3
While I agree that KM3 should not have to deal with it, since it
sacrifices usability I think it should be fixed even if it contradicts
the original concept.
Or at least introduce default values.
The "and not very beautiful" in the FAQ is IMO ridiculous considering
the problem.
It looks like they may be going to change it, but that didn't help me with my
current project.