[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Newsgroup Home]
[news.eclipse.tools.emf] Re: Databinding and EFeatureMap (Re: AdapterFactoryContentProvider and notificat

Tom,

A very good point indeed.  I'd need to open a bugzilla anyway because no line of code is committed without a bugzilla entry which allows us to generate our release notes http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/news/relnotes.php?project=emf&version=HEAD that include a little link next to each bug which goes to the search view http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/searchcvs.php?q=215260 where the link on the right of the entry goes to http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.emf/org.eclipse.emf/plugins/org.eclipse.emf.edit/src/org/eclipse/emf/edit/provider/ItemProvider.java?root=Modeling_Project&r1=1.7&r2=1.8 which is an online diff view of the change.  It's just too cool.  Never again do I have to personally and the question, what did you change for this bugzilla nor even the question, what did you put in this build or what build is this bugzilla in?



Tom Schindl wrote:
[...]
I don't know if EObjectObservableMap is really supposed to handle the case of the key being a FeatureMap.Entry, or some unwrapping logic (FeatureMap.Entry#getValue()) needs to be inserted outside... (but where?) :-)
It seems to me that everything should be handled gracefully.  But as I said in other notes in the group, I've really tested this stuff very little.  I told Boris I wasn't going to check in the map support because I didn't understand how it was used.  So he explained it to him and then it made more sense, but that was a few months ago now.  If you wanted to send me a zipped up (exported) set of projects I could import to reproduce the problem either in the newsgroup or to merks at ca dot ibm dot com I'd have a look at fixing it in time for next week's build....


Would it make more sense todo this in bugzilla, then I could attach myself there and get informations about the progress.

Tom


JPEG image

JPEG image